Devon Nunes v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, et al
| DEVON NUNES |
| WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT |
| 23-1837 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending the submission of an additional document. As it appears that Appellant resides in a house and is not confined, he must file an amended affidavit detailing the expenses he incurs on average per month in Section 8 of the affidavit. Another copy of a blank affidavit is enclosed for Appellants convenience. Appellant must submit the amended affidavit of poverty within 14 days of the date of this order or the appeal may be dismissed. (PDB) [Entered: 06/15/2023 12:41 PM]
|
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jason K. Zubata on behalf of Appellee(s) Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional Center; U.S. Attorney General; U.S. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. [23-1837] (JKZ) [Entered: 05/18/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION filed by Appellant Devon Nunes to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Devon Nunes in District Court No. 1-23-cv-00510. (PDB) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
