Keith Davis v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
KEITH VERNON DAVIS |
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI |
23-2411 |
August 7, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned letter [ # 12 ] sent to Appellant Keith Vernon Davis. Mail was returned because RETURN TO SENDER - VACANT - UNABLE TO FORWARD. The mail is hereby resent to the existing address on file. (AMR) [Entered: 09/29/2023 03:58 PM] |
Filing 12 RETURNED MAIL. U.S. Postal Service returned clerk letter [ # 9 ] sent to Appellant Keith Vernon Davis on August 28, 2023. Mail was returned marked refused. According to the locator, Appellant is still housed at Houtzdale SCI. The mail is hereby resent to the existing address on file. (CJG) [Entered: 09/18/2023 01:38 PM] |
Filing 11 CLERK LETTER SENT to Appellant in response to his request for information regarding briefing deadlines. (CJG) [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:29 AM] |
Filing 10 LETTER from Appellant Keith Vernon Davis requesting information regarding the deadline for filing Appellant's brief. (CJG) [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:29 AM] |
Filing 9 CLERK LETTER SENT to Appellant providing the requested copy of the docket sheet. (CJG) [Entered: 08/28/2023 11:10 AM] |
Filing 8 LETTER from Appellant Keith Vernon Davis requesting copy of the docket. (CJG) [Entered: 08/28/2023 11:06 AM] |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Keith Vernon Davis for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal Pro Se and Request for Waiver of Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 pursuant to the First, Sixth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. (CJG) [Entered: 08/18/2023 09:41 AM] |
Filing 5 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 08/09/2023 02:21 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION filed by Appellant Keith Vernon Davis for Certificate of Appealability. Response due on 08/28/2023. Clerk's Office made service on 08/09/2023. Service made by US mail. (SLC) [Entered: 08/09/2023 10:12 AM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 10:12 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 10:07 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Keith Vernon Davis in District Court No. 3-22-cv-00152. (CJG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Keith Davis v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: KEITH VERNON DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Keith Vernon Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI | |
Represented By: | Warren L. Crilly Esq. III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.