Margarita Marshall v. United States Post Office, et al
MARGARITA MARSHALL |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL TORT CENTER |
24-3104 |
November 8, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Margarita Marshall. Certificate of service dated 01/06/2025 by ECF. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 01/06/2025 02:47 PM] |
Filing 14 ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Margarita Marshall. Certificate of Service dated 01/06/2025 by ECF. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 01/06/2025 02:43 PM] |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER (Clerk) granting Letter Motion to be Excused from Pilot Program for Appendix Citation Hyperlinking filed by Robert S. Tintner, Esq. on behalf of Appellant Margarita Marshall. Should counsel receive notice to participate in the program in future cases, counsel must notify the Court within the specified time frame if he elects to opt out or he will be required to comply. (DW) [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:19 AM] |
Filing 12 ECF FILER: LETTER MOTION from Attorney Robert S. Tintner, Esq. for Appellant Margarita Marshall to be excused from Pilot Program for Appendix Citation Hyperlinking. Certificate of Service dated 12/03/2024. Service made by ECF. [24-3104]--[Edited 12/03/2024 by PDB] (RST) [Entered: 12/03/2024 02:24 PM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 11/27/2024 10:23 AM] |
Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Margarita Marshall due on or before 01/06/2025. Appendix due on or before 01/06/2025. (PDB) [Entered: 11/27/2024 10:20 AM] |
Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Margarita Marshall. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 11/21/2024 04:51 PM] |
Filing 8 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Margarita Marshall. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 11/21/2024 11:43 AM] |
Filing 7 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Margarita Marshall advising this court that no transcripts are available. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 11/21/2024 11:39 AM] |
Filing 6 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mansi G. Shah on behalf of Appellee(s) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES POST OFFICE; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE NATIONAL TORT CENTER. [24-3104] (MS) [Entered: 11/15/2024 09:40 AM] |
Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert S. Tintner, Esquire on behalf of Appellant(s) Margarita Marshall. [24-3104] (RST) [Entered: 11/13/2024 03:18 PM] |
Filing 4 Appendix Citation Notice sent to Adam E. Grutzmacher, Esq., Mansi Shah, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 11/25/2024. (PDB) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:57 PM] |
Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (PDB) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:56 PM] |
Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:56 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Margarita Marshall in District Court No. 2:24-cv-01931. (PDB) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.