<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Carl Bell v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca3/25-3197</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca3/25-3197/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 17:49:45 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 17:49:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Carl Bell v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 7</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 7]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION filed by Appellant Carl Edward Bell for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing. Certificate of Service dated 04/22/2026. Service made by US mail. (SB) [Entered: 05/05/2026 04:32 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34688162</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 6]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER (RESTREPO, PORTER and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Circuit Judges) Appellants request for a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Jurists of reason would agree, without debate, that most of Appellants claims in his habeas petition were properly dismissed by the District Court as untimely, for essentially the reasons set forth in the District Courts opinion. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010); Wallace v. Mahanoy, 2 F.4th 133, 151 (3d Cir. 2021). Even assuming that Appellants claims pertaining to the victims autopsy report were timely, reasonable jurists could not debate that those claims were inexcusably procedurally defaulted. See Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 14 (2012); Gaines v. Superintendent Benner Twp. SCI, 33 F.4th 705, 71011 (3d Cir. 2022); Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985).. Panel No.: DLD-104. Porter, Authoring Judge. (SB) [Entered: 04/09/2026 09:21 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34688163</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Michael E. Burns, Esq. for Appellee District Attorney Erie County requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 12/17/2025. (SB) [Entered: 12/03/2025 09:09 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_32355822</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 11/18/2025 04:50 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_32355823</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (SB) [Entered: 11/12/2025 12:02 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_31314648</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 11/12/2025 12:01 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_31314649</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Carl Edward Bell in District Court No. 1:21-cv-00292. (SB) [Entered: 11/12/2025 11:59 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_31314650</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
