Michael Tann v. Ludwikoski

Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL EUGENE TANN
Defendant - Appellee: LUDWIKOSKI and GEORGE MATEJA
Case Number: 10-1380
Filed: April 7, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 18, 2010 Michael Tann v. Ludwikoski

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 18, 2010 402942797 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998325209-3] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00612-BEL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998405930] [10-1380]
Search for this case: Michael Tann v. Ludwikoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL EUGENE TANN
Represented By: Michael Eugene Tann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LUDWIKOSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GEORGE MATEJA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.