Harold Boosahda v. Providence Dane LLC
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD BOOSAHDA
Defendant - Appellee: PROVIDENCE DANE LLC
Case Number: 10-1933
Filed: August 13, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 31, 2012 Harold Boosahda v. Providence Dane LLC

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 403735001 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00556-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court. [998776384]. [10-1933]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harold Boosahda v. Providence Dane LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: HAROLD BOOSAHDA
Represented By: Ernest Francis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PROVIDENCE DANE LLC
Represented By: David Benjamin Ashe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?