In re: Gary Terry
Petitioner: In re: GARY IVAN TERRY
:
Case Number: 10-2410
Filed: December 21, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 4, 2011 In re: Gary Terry

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403228675 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998496709-2]; denying Motion to vacate [998494626-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998493925-2] Originating case number: 1:03-cr-00299-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998537831] [10-2410]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Gary Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: GARY IVAN TERRY
Represented By: Gary Ivan Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Lisa Blue Boggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?