Corey Johnson v. Loretta Kelley
Petitioner - Appellant: COREY E. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: LORETTA KELLEY
Case Number: 10-6588
Filed: April 20, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 10, 2010 Corey Johnson v. Loretta Kelley

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 402977326 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [998330922-2], denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [998323312-2] Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00086-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998422091] [10-6588]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Corey Johnson v. Loretta Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: COREY E. JOHNSON
Represented By: Corey E. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LORETTA KELLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?