Frank Blount v. Gene Johnson
Petitioner - Appellant: FRANK A. BLOUNT
Respondent - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Case Number: 10-6810
Filed: June 9, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 27, 2010 Frank Blount v. Gene Johnson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 403128358 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:09-cv-00331-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998491480] [10-6810]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frank Blount v. Gene Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: FRANK A. BLOUNT
Represented By: Frank A. Blount
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Represented By: Donald Eldridge Jeffrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?