In re: James Irby, III
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN IRBY, III
:
Case Number: 11-1128
Filed: February 11, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 6, 2011 In re: James Irby, III

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403280698 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998523607-2]; dismissing Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) filed by Petitioner James Allen Irby, III [998523605-2] Originating case number: 8:03-cr-00490-DKC-1,8:07-cv-01186-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998562024]. Mailed to: Irby. [11-1128]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: James Irby, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN IRBY, III
Represented By: James Allen Irby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Mythili Raman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?