Michael A. McNeil v. State of Maryland
| MICHAEL C. MCNEIL |
| STATE OF MARYLAND, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, HOWARD COUNTY, Circuit Court, DIANE O. LEASURE, Chief Administrative Judge, in her Official and Individual Capacity, LOUIS A. BECKER, III, Associate Judge, in his Official Capacity, MARY. M. KRAMER, Master in Chancery, in her Official Capacity, LISA S. MOHINK, Family Law Coordinator, in her Official and Individual Capacity, PATRICIA BRIGHT, Court Social Worker, in her Official and Individual Capacity, CHRISTINIA BIEGANSKI, Supervised Visitation Center Manager, in her Official and Individual Capacity, SUSAN R. GNATT, Supervisory Court Reporter, in her Official and Individual Capacity, STEPHEN A. DRAZIN, PETER V. MARKUSKI, JR., SARAH P. MCNEIL, VINCENT LOVE and M. SLUTSKY & ASSOCIATES, INC |
| 12-2139 |
| September 18, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Michael McNeil v. State of Maryland |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404269763
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [998989140-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998964552-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998960655-2] Originating case number: 8:11-cv-02495-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999026185]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Wayne Bernstein, Stephen A. Drazin, Michael A. McNeil, Sarah P. McNeil, Timothy J. Mummert.. [12-2139]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
