US v. Kalonji Ewing
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KALONJI SKOU EWING, a/k/a Luck
Case Number:
13-6611
Filed:
April 18, 2013
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit:
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Date Filed | Description |
|---|---|
| September 4, 2013 | US v. Kalonji Ewing |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| September 4, 2013 | 404611452 |
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999090464-3]; denying a certificate of appealability. Originating case number: 5:09-cr-00151-FL-1,5:12-cv-00369-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999186175]. Mailed to: Kalonji Ewing. [13-6611]
|
| Search for this case: US v. Kalonji Ewing | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Denise Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: KALONJI SKOU EWING, a/k/a Luck | |
| Represented By: | Kalonji Skou Ewing |
| Represented By: | Herscal P. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.