Ronald Legg v. South Carolina

Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. LEGG
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA and W. THOMAS FLOYD
Case Number: 13-6653
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 23, 2013 Ronald Legg v. South Carolina

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2013 404548073 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00172-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999156572]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-6653]
Search for this case: Ronald Legg v. South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RONALD L. LEGG
Represented By: Ronald L. Legg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: W. THOMAS FLOYD
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.