US v. Kunta Redd
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KUNTA KENTA REDD
Case Number: 14-7209
Filed: August 19, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 23, 2015 US v. Kunta Redd

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405763617 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999432296-2] Originating case number: 7:08-cr-00043-D-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999724255]. Mailed to: Kunta Redd. [14-7209]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Kunta Redd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: William Ellis Boyle
Represented By: Michael Gordon James
Represented By: Timothy Severo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: KUNTA KENTA REDD
Represented By: Kunta Kenta Redd
Represented By: Laura Sutton Wasco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?