Robbie Peterson v. Richard Burge
| ROBBIE WAYNE PETERSON |
| RICHARD P. BURGESS, of Cherokee County Sheriff Office |
| 14-7741 |
| November 26, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Robbie Peterson v. Richard Burgess |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405497496
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00141-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999600180]. Mailed to: Robbie Peterson. [14-7741]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robbie Peterson v. Richard Burge | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ROBBIE WAYNE PETERSON | |
| Represented By: | Robbie Wayne Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: RICHARD P. BURGESS, of Cherokee County Sheriff Office | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Holmes Burton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
