Monte Hooper v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance
Defendant: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INCORPORATED and MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff - Appellant: MONTE HOOPER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, MICHELIN MEDICAL CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN and MICHELIN PENSION AND BENEFITS BOARD
Case Number: 15-2157
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 13, 2017 Monte Hooper v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406563779 UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:12-cv-01519-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000099558]. [15-2157]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Monte Hooper v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MONTE HOOPER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: James Robinson Gilreath
Represented By: William Mitchell Hogan
Represented By: Cheryl Forest Perkins
Represented By: Charles W. Whetstone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Mark William Bakker
Represented By: Arthur Gerald Boylan
Represented By: Donald Troy Campbell
Represented By: J. Theodore Gentry
Represented By: Brian William Thomson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHELIN MEDICAL CARE AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN
Represented By: Vance Earle Drawdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MICHELIN PENSION AND BENEFITS BOARD
Represented By: Vance Earle Drawdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Mark William Bakker
Represented By: Arthur Gerald Boylan
Represented By: Donald Troy Campbell
Represented By: J. Theodore Gentry
Represented By: Brian William Thomson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Represented By: Vance Earle Drawdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?