US v. Kavin William
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KAVIN DATRON WILLIAMS |
| 15-7172 |
| July 28, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405917216
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to remand case [999756802-3]; granting Motion to vacate [999756802-2]; terminating Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999765225-2] Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00088-D-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999796916]. Mailed to: Kavin Datron Williams. [15-7172]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Kavin William | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Shailika S. Kotiya |
| Represented By: | William Glenn Perry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: KAVIN DATRON WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Kavin Datron Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
