James Roseboro v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
JAMES ROSEBORO, a/k/a James Edward Roseboro |
WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE |
15-7582 |
October 7, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
James Roseboro v. Warden Leroy Cartledge |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405859946 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed denying certificate of appealability. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03160-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999769906]. Mailed to: James Roseboro. [15-7582] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Roseboro v. Warden Leroy Cartledge | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: JAMES ROSEBORO, a/k/a James Edward Roseboro | |
Represented By: | James Roseboro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE | |
Represented By: | James Anthony Mabry |
Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.