Marlow Bates, Sr. v. Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLOW L. BATES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: APPLE, INC.
Case Number: 16-2278
Filed: November 4, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 31, 2017 Marlow Bates, Sr. v. Apple, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406462815 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999977962-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00929-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000053119]. Mailed to: Marlow L. Bates, Sr. [16-2278]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marlow Bates, Sr. v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MARLOW L. BATES, SR.
Represented By: Marlow L. Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: APPLE, INC.
Represented By: Rachel S. Janger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?