US v. Tamara Williams-Kelly
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TAMARA WILLIAMS-KELLY
Case Number: 16-4487
Filed: August 9, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 7, 2017 US v. Tamara Williams-Kelly

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406388212 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to expedite decision [1000002564-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cr-00036-FDW-DSC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000018447]. [16-4487]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Tamara Williams-Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Sanjeev Bhasker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TAMARA WILLIAMS-KELLY
Represented By: Rahwa Gebre-Egziabher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?