Teddie Grant v. R. H. Mauney
Petitioner - Appellant: TEDDIE LEE GRANT
Respondent - Appellee: R. H. MAUNEY, Warden
Case Number: 16-6328
Filed: March 7, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 13, 2016 Teddie Grant v. R.H. Mauney

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406233875 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999787953-2]. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00269-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999946388]. Mailed to: Teddie Grant. [16-6328]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Teddie Grant v. R. H. Mauney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: TEDDIE LEE GRANT
Represented By: Teddie Lee Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: R. H. MAUNEY, Warden
Represented By: James Anthony Mabry
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?