Rodger Hanson v. Dr. Robert Owen
| RODGER HANSON |
| DR. ROBERT OWENS |
| 16-6915 |
| July 13, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Rodger Hanson v. Dr. Robert Owens |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406328423
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999945065-2]. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03078-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999990621]. Mailed to: Rodger Hanson. [16-6915]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rodger Hanson v. Dr. Robert Owen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RODGER HANSON | |
| Represented By: | Rodger Hanson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: DR. ROBERT OWENS | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Douglas Childs |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Pharr McCullough |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
