Thomas C. Wilson v. Sally Ann Chickering
| THOMAS CLAY WILSON |
| SALLY ANN CHICKERING |
| 16-7185 |
| September 2, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Thomas Wilson v. Sally Chickering |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406332806
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:16-cv-01579-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992643]. Mailed to: Thomas Clay Wilson CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 3841 Leeds Avenue Charleston, SC 29405-0000. [16-7185]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas C. Wilson v. Sally Ann Chickering | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: THOMAS CLAY WILSON | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Clay Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: SALLY ANN CHICKERING | |
| Represented By: | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
