Rodger Dale Mitchell v. Karen Pszczolkowski
| RODGER DALE MITCHELL |
| KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI |
| 16-7434 |
| October 18, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Rodger Mitchell v. Karen Pszczolkowski |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406480759
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-12156 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000061257]. Mailed to: Rodger Dale Mitchell HUTTONSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER P. O. Box 1 Huttonsville, WV 26273-0000 Zachary Aaron Viglianco. [16-7434]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rodger Dale Mitchell v. Karen Pszczolkowski | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: RODGER DALE MITCHELL | |
| Represented By: | Rodger Dale Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Aaron Viglianco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
