US v. Randell Harri
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RANDELL BRICE HARRIS, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris
Case Number: 16-7569
Filed: November 9, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 20, 2017 US v. Randell Harris

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406364354 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:94-cr-00012-MOC-2,3:15-cv-00304-MOC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000007266].. [16-7569]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Randell Harri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Elizabeth Margaret Greenough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RANDELL BRICE HARRIS, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris
Represented By: Randell Brice Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?