Michael Curtis Reynolds v. Warden Timothy Stewart
MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS |
WARDEN TIMOTHY STEWART |
16-7590 |
November 15, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Michael Reynolds v. Warden Timothy Stewart |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406443371 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999983115-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-03471-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000044068]. Mailed to: Michael Curtis Reynolds FCI CUMBERLAND FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Cumberland, MD 21501-0000. [16-7590] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Curtis Reynolds v. Warden Timothy Stewart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS | |
Represented By: | Michael Curtis Reynolds |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN TIMOTHY STEWART | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.