Temesgen Teshome Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill
| TEMESGEN TESHOME ABDISSA |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA |
| 17-1078 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Temesgen Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406536887
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00394-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087212]. Mailed to: Temesgen Teshome Abdissa 6806 Horseback Lane Raleigh, NC 27610. [17-1078]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Temesgen Teshome Abdissa v. UNC Chapel Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: TEMESGEN TESHOME ABDISSA | |
| Represented By: | Temesgen Teshome Abdissa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Lou Trippe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
