Clarence McGuffin v. Nancy Berryhill
| CLARENCE ANDREW MCGUFFIN |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 17-1288 |
| March 6, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Clarence McGuffin v. Nancy Berryhill |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406697609
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00467-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000161705].. [17-1288]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Clarence McGuffin v. Nancy Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CLARENCE ANDREW MCGUFFIN | |
| Represented By: | Clarence Andrew McGuffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Rudy E. Renfer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
