US v. Timothy Leak
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEAK
Case Number: 17-6007
Filed: January 4, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2017 US v. Timothy Leak

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 406541222 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02166-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000089173]. Mailed to: Timothy Leak. [17-6007, 17-6190]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Timothy Leak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jennifer Dee Dannels
Represented By: Robert J. Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: TIMOTHY LEAK
Represented By: Timothy Leak
Represented By: Diana Helene Pereira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?