Kane Anthony Fosnaught v. Harold W. Clarke
KANE ANTHONY FOSNAUGHT |
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections |
17-6256 |
March 1, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406541116 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000047928-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00115-RBS-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000089134]. Mailed to: Kane Anthony Fosnaught LAWRENCEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER 1607 Planters Road Lawrenceville, VA 23868-0000. [17-6256] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Kane Anthony Fosnaught v. Harold W. Clarke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: KANE ANTHONY FOSNAUGHT | |
Represented By: | Kane Anthony Fosnaught |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Hyman Katz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.