Marvin Rideout v. Harold Clarke
| MARVIN RIDEOUT |
| HAROLD CLARKE, D.O.C. |
| 17-6382 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
406677479
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [1000055936-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000063796-2]. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00190-MHL-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000152104]. Mailed to: Marvin Rideout. [17-6382]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marvin Rideout v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: MARVIN RIDEOUT | |
| Represented By: | Marvin Rideout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, D.O.C. | |
| Represented By: | Rosemary Virginia Bourne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
