US v. Brandon Dupree James
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
BRANDON DUPREE JAMES |
17-6522 |
April 18, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406933187 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expand certificate of appealability [1000072157-2] Originating case number: 0:11-cr-02327-MBS-1,0:14-cv-00948-MBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000271077]. Mailed to: Brandon Dupree James UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON P. O. Box 2000 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525-2000. [17-6522] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Brandon Dupree James | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | William Kenneth Witherspoon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: BRANDON DUPREE JAMES | |
Represented By: | Brandon Dupree James |
Represented By: | Louis H. Lang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.