US v. Webster Williams, III
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III |
17-6794 |
June 22, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 406653956 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion to strike the Government s response [1000112427-2]; denying Motion to correct error [1000127728-2]. Originating case numbers: 4:12-cr-00969-RBH-1, 4:17-cv-00350-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000141306]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6794] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Webster Williams, III | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | William E. Day |
Represented By: | Stanley D. Ragsdale |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III | |
Represented By: | Webster Douglas Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.