David Martinez v. Harold Clarke
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the V.D.O.C.
Case Number: 18-6503
Filed: May 8, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 407083392 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000300793-2], certificate of appealability denied. Originating case number: 7:17-cv-00377-JPJ-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000339447]. Mailed to: D. Martinez. [18-6503]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Martinez v. Harold Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: DAVID MARTINEZ
Represented By: David Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the V.D.O.C.
Represented By: Christopher P. Schandevel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?