Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. The State of North Carolina
| SARDIA MARIE HANKINS, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DAVID R. SHEARON, TRUCPHOUONG NGUYEN, ANGUS NGUYEN and TRUCPHUONG NGUYEN |
| TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR. |
| 19-1538 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. The State of North Carolina |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr. in 19-170, 19-1520, 19-1538 to recuse North Carolina judges from these appeals. Date and method of service: 06/02/2019 US mail. [1000525273] [19-170, 19-1520, 19-1538] CT [Entered: 06/05/2019 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) DOCUMENT in support of his claims by Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr. in 19-170, 19-1520, 19-1538. [1000524070] [19-170, 19-1520, 19-1538]--[Edited 06/05/2019 by CT]--[Edited 06/06/2019 by TJP - fixed entry-restricted format] CT [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.. [19-1538] CT [Entered: 05/31/2019 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00061-D. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1538] CT [Entered: 05/20/2019 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: T. Hankins. Informal Opening Brief due 06/13/2019. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1538] CT [Entered: 05/20/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00061-D. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-1538] CT [Entered: 05/20/2019 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
