Thurmond Guess, Sr. v. Sharon Y. Hipps
| GALLIVANT WHITE BOYD, SHIRLEY H. RIVERS, WILLIAM P. A. BUYCK, JR., ELLIOT B. DANIELS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, JOHN AUSTIN HOOD, H. RANALD STANLEY, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, SHARON Y. HIPPS and JOHNSTON COX |
| THURMOND R. GUESS, SR. |
| 19-1684 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Thurmond Guess, Sr. v. Sharon Y. Hipps |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT referencing [ # 5 ] informal opening brief by Thurmond R. Guess, Sr. [1000543772] [19-1684] KH [Entered: 07/09/2019 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Thurmond R. Guess, Sr.. [19-1684] KH [Entered: 07/09/2019 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENT - Copy of notice of appeal filed in District Court by Thurmond R. Guess, Sr. [1000539391] [19-1684] KH [Entered: 07/01/2019 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00400-CMC. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-1684] KH [Entered: 06/25/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Thurmond R. Guess, Sr. Apt. 124 3111 Two Notch Road Columbia, SC 29204. Informal Opening Brief due 07/19/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-1684] KH [Entered: 06/25/2019 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00400-CMC. Case manager: KHancock. [19-1684] KH [Entered: 06/25/2019 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
