In re: Shapat Nabaya
Petitioner: In re: SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott
Case Number: 19-2105
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 27, 2020 In re: Shapat Nabaya

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2019 Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 3 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1. Mailed to: Shapat Nabaya. [19-2105] AW [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:57 AM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 3 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya. [19-2105] AW [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:56 AM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 2 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya. [19-2105] AW [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:53 AM]
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1. Case manager: AWalker. [19-2105] AW [Entered: 10/09/2019 11:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Shapat Nabaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott
Represented By: Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?