Curtis Shuler v. Kenneth Lassiter
| CURTIS D. SHULER |
| R. JOHNSON, KENNETH BEAVER, DENNIS SELZER, KENNETH E. LASSITER, KENNETH POTEAT and B. TEAGUE |
| 20-7228 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Curtis D. Shuler re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Curtis Shuler. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Curtis Shuler. [1000826539] [20-7228] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Curtis D. Shuler. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 09/09/2020 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Curtis D. Shuler. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 09/09/2020 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00050-MR. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 08/24/2020 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Curtis D. Shuler ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Curtis Shuler. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 08/24/2020 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00050-MR. Case manager: REdwards. [20-7228] RE [Entered: 08/24/2020 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
