Marco Owens v. SC Department of Corrections
| SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR BRYAN STERLING, HEAD QUARTERS CLASSIFICATION, WARDEN WASHINGTON, OFFICER COKLY and MAJOR OCEAN |
| MARCO OWENS |
| 20-7248 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Marco Owens v. SC Department of Corrections |
| Marco Owens v. SC Department of Corrections |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Marco Owens re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Marco Owens. [20-7248] RE [Entered: 10/06/2020 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00476-BHH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-7248] RE [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Marco Owens. Informal Opening Brief due 09/21/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-7248] RE [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Marco Owens ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Marco Owens. [20-7248] RE [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-00476-BHH. Case manager: REdwards. [20-7248] RE [Entered: 08/26/2020 09:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
