Paul Hurst v. Walter West
| PAUL MARTIN HURST |
| BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland and WARDEN WALTER WEST |
| 21-6468 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 17 ]. Number of days granted: 21. Opening brief and appendix due 06/01/2021. Response brief due 07/01/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000940296] [21-6468] EB [Entered: 04/26/2021 11:40 AM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION by Paul Martin Hurst to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until by three weeks to May 31, 2021.. Date and method of service: 04/26/2021 ecf. [1000940269] [21-6468] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 04/26/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 16 Amended DOCKETING STATEMENT by Paul Martin Hurst. [21-6468] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 04/23/2021 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 CORRECTION to DOCKETING STATEMENT by Brian E. Frosh and Walter West. [21-6468] Jer Welter [Entered: 04/16/2021 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 14 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) DOCKETING STATEMENT by Paul Martin Hurst. [21-6468]--[Edited 04/23/2021 by EB- See ECF 16 for amended docketing statement] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Paul Martin Hurst. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000931378] [21-6468] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael E. Lawlor for Paul Martin Hurst. [1000931376] [21-6468] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Brian E. Frosh and Walter West. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000926269] [21-6468] Jer Welter [Entered: 03/31/2021 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jer Welter for Brian E. Frosh and Walter West. [1000926247] [21-6468] Jer Welter [Entered: 03/31/2021 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 05/10/2021. Response Brief due 06/09/2021. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/29/2021 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] habeas case. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-02411-TDC. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/29/2021 02:16 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER filed rescinding informal briefing schedule. Copies to all parties. [1000924833] [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/29/2021 02:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting Motion to appoint/assign counsel [ # 5 ]. Michael E. Lawlor for Paul Martin Hurst in 21-6468. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 03/09/2021. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Paul Martin Hurst. [1000924822] [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/29/2021 02:09 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Paul Martin Hurst to appoint/assign counsel.. Date and method of service: 03/29/2021 ecf. [1000924537] [21-6468] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 03/29/2021 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-02411-TDC. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/29/2021 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 04/09/2021. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/26/2021 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Paul Martin Hurst. Informal Opening Brief due 04/19/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/26/2021 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-02411-TDC. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/24/2021. Case manager: EBorneisen. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [21-6468] EB [Entered: 03/26/2021 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
