Shavis Holloman v. Jeffrey Kiser
DELMA TATE, Major at ROSP, HOLLOWAY, (A-Days) Correctional Officer at ROSP, FARMER, Officer at ROSP, R. MULLINS, Correctional Officer at ROSP, JEFFREY KISER, Warden at ROSP, HILL, (A-Nights) Correctional Officer at ROSP, OFFICER B. WHITT, S. FULLER, Assistant Warden at ROSP, WALKER, Transportation Officer at ROSP, OFFICER L. VITATOE, LOVELL, Transportation Officer at ROSP and DUTTON, Correctional Officer at ROSP |
SHAVIS HOLLOMAN |
21-6772 |
May 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Shavis Holloman re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Shavis Holloman. [21-6772] RE [Entered: 06/17/2021 11:24 AM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00115-TTC-RSB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-6772] RE [Entered: 06/01/2021 08:23 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Shavis Holloman. Informal Opening Brief due 06/10/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-6772] RE [Entered: 05/17/2021 01:57 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Shavis Holloman ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Shavis Holloman. [21-6772] RE [Entered: 05/17/2021 01:55 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00115-TTC-RSB. Case manager: REdwards. [21-6772] RE [Entered: 05/17/2021 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.