Abdu-Salim Gould v. Kenneth Lassiter
| DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and ROY COOPER |
| WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON, EDDIE THOMAS, BRYANT SOUCIER, Lieutenant and KENNETH E. LASSITER |
| ABDU-SALIM GOULD |
| 21-6911 |
| June 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03154-BO. Mailed to: appellant. [21-6911] MR [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:01 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 5 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: appellant. [1000993769] [21-6911] MR [Entered: 07/28/2021 02:59 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Abdu-Salim Gould to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [5]. Date and method of service: 07/05/2021 US mail. [1000993765] [21-6911] MR [Entered: 07/28/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Abdu-Salim Gould re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: appellant. [21-6911] MR [Entered: 07/15/2021 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Abdu-Salim Gould ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: appellant. [21-6911] MR [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03154-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-6911] MR [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03154-BO. Case manager: MRadday. [21-6911] MR [Entered: 06/10/2021 12:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
