Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant
| MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN |
| NADINE J. BRYANT, P. M. MANNION, ARLENE BURGRESS TOODLE, M. A. KHAN, M. BOSSIE, BYRON SCOTT CARTER, UNKNOWN DOE 1, Nurse and UNKNOWN DOE 2, Correctional Officer (aka Dervin) |
| 21-7362 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER filed extending filing time for opening brief and appendix. Opening brief and appendix due 01/31/2022. Response brief due 03/18/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001062473] [21-7362] RHS [Entered: 11/19/2021 04:29 PM]
|
| Mediation forms. [21-7362] LHP [Entered: 11/04/2021 11:11 AM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER filed extending filing time for opening brief and appendix until 01/14/2021. Number of days granted: 24. Opening brief and appendix due 01/14/2022. Response brief due 02/14/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001050716] [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:50 AM]
|
| Filing 22 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rosalind E. Dillon for Matthew James Griffin. [1001045932] [21-7362] Rosalind Dillon [Entered: 10/21/2021 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 21 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by M. Bossie, Nadine J. Bryant, Byron Scott Carter and Arlene Burgress Toodle. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001044117] [21-7362] Bryan Nichols [Entered: 10/19/2021 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 20 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Bryan Nichols for Nadine J. Bryant, Arlene Burgress Toodle, M. Bossie and Byron Scott Carter. [1001042955] [21-7362] Bryan Nichols [Entered: 10/18/2021 02:43 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 17 ]. Number of days granted: 30. Opening brief and appendix due 12/22/2021. Response brief due 01/21/2022. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1001041503] [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 10/14/2021 05:06 PM]
|
| Filing 18 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [21-7362] MRB [Entered: 10/14/2021 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION by Matthew James Griffin to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until December 22, 2021.. Date and method of service: 10/14/2021 ecf. [1001041188] [21-7362] Devi Rao [Entered: 10/14/2021 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Vanessa N. Garrido for M. A. Khan. [1001040628] [21-7362] Vanessa Garrido [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 15 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by M. A. Khan. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001040625] [21-7362] David Fothergill [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David M. Fothergill for M. A. Khan. [1001040623] [21-7362] David Fothergill [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 13 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 11/22/2021. Response Brief due 12/22/2021. [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 10/13/2021 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to M. Bossie, Nadine J. Bryant, Byron Scott Carter, M. A. Khan and Arlene Burgress Toodle re: filing of appearance form, filing of disclosure form. Forms due on 10/18/2021. [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 10/13/2021 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 11 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Matthew James Griffin. [21-7362] Devi Rao [Entered: 10/12/2021 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Matthew James Griffin. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001039652] [21-7362] Devi Rao [Entered: 10/12/2021 05:09 PM] |
|
Filing 9
DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03173-M. [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 09/29/2021 04:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER filed rescinding informal briefing. Copies to all parties. [1001032543] [21-7362] JSN [Entered: 09/29/2021 04:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Matthew James Griffin re: filing of disclosure form, docketing statement. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/29/2021 04:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03173-M. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/29/2021 04:20 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Devi M. Rao for Matthew James Griffin. [1001031604] [21-7362] Devi Rao [Entered: 09/28/2021 04:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 10/08/2021. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 11:31 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 10/18/2021. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 11:20 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Matthew James Griffin ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 11:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 1
Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03173-M. Case manager: CathyHerb. [21-7362] CT [Entered: 09/24/2021 09:52 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
