Iris Vasquez-Rivera v. Merrick Garland
Petitioner: IRIS BANESSA VASQUEZ-RIVERA, M.E.V.V. and A.V.V.V.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Case Number: 22-1932
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 16, 2023 Iris Vasquez-Rivera v. Merrick Garland

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2022 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Amber A. Arthur for Merrick B. Garland. [1001225046] [22-1932] Amber Arthur [Entered: 09/07/2022 08:27 AM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Iris Banessa Vasquez-Rivera, M.E.V.V. and A.V.V.V.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001225008] [22-1932] Michael Rosado [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:19 PM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael E. Rosado for A.V.V.V., M.E.V.V. and Iris Banessa Vasquez-Rivera. [1001225007] [22-1932] Michael Rosado [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:15 PM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 09/06/2022. [ # 2 ] petition for review. [1001224911] Administrative Record due 10/17/2022. [22-1932] KH [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:19 PM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A209-226-154, A209-226-155, A209-226-156. [1001224904] [22-1932] KH [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:16 PM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by A.V.V.V., M.E.V.V. and Iris Banessa Vasquez-Rivera .[1001224901] [22-1932] KH [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:14 PM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-72715-493. [1001224898] [22-1932] KH [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:12 PM]
September 6, 2022 Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-226-154, A209-226-155, A209-226-156. Case manager: KHancock. [1001224895] [22-1932] KH [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Iris Vasquez-Rivera v. Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: IRIS BANESSA VASQUEZ-RIVERA
Represented By: Michael Ernest Rosado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: M.E.V.V.
Represented By: Michael Ernest Rosado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: A.V.V.V.
Represented By: Michael Ernest Rosado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Represented By: Amber Ashley Arthur
Represented By: OIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?