Markese Jones v. Harold Clarke
| MARKESE LAMOND JONES |
| HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections |
| 22-7012 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to [ # 7 ] informal opening brief by Markese Lamond Jones. [1001246205] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 10/12/2022 01:07 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [8]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Markese Lamond Jones, #1446668, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001233240] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/21/2022 10:04 AM]
|
| Filing 8 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Markese Lamond Jones. [1001233237] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/21/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Markese Lamond Jones. [1001233223] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/21/2022 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD filed (paper form): Record Part: State Court Records, Volumes Location: 1-4 (Volume 1&2 - Court of Appeals of Virginia; Volume 3 - Supreme Court of Virginia; Volume 4 - Mecklenburg Circuit Court). [1001225918] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 09/15/2022. [1001222722] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/01/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00311-RAJ-RJK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR & SOR included? N/A. State court paper record to be requested in 2254 case? Yes. [1001222720] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/01/2022 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Markese Lamond Jones, #1446668, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001222713] Informal Opening Brief due 09/26/2022. [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/01/2022 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Markese Lamond Jones - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/03/2022. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00311-RAJ-RJK. Mailed to: Markese Lamond Jones, #1446668, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001222705] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/01/2022 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00311-RAJ-RJK. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/31/2022. Case manager: KStump. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001222699] [22-7012] KS [Entered: 09/01/2022 08:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Markese Jones v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MARKESE LAMOND JONES | |
| Represented By: | Markese Lamond Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Victoria Lee Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
