In re: Shapat Nabaya
| In re: SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott |
| 23-2315 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED re: tendered payment returned to Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya in paper form. Amount of payment: $505. Mailed to: Shapat Nabaya 11124 Chester Garden Circle Chester, VA 23831. [1001496765] [23-2315] SWV [Entered: 12/29/2023 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 01/16/2024. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1. Mailed to: Shapat Nabaya. [1001496631] [23-2315] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001496621] [23-2315] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for extraordinary writ under FRAP 21 filed by Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya. [1001496627] [23-2315] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Shapat Nabaya | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott | |
| Represented By: | Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
