USA v. Jose Olivo
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAVIER PEREZ, also known as Rogaceano Coronado-Delgadillo, also known as Jose Leonardo Olivo |
| 11-40993 |
| September 16, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
511761490
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [11-40993 Affirmed ] Judge: PEH , Judge: EMG , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 03/09/2012 for Appellant Jose Leonardo Olivo; granting motion for summary affirmance filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Leonardo Olivo [6969094-2] [11-40993]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jose Olivo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Renata Ann Gowie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: JAVIER PEREZ, also known as Rogaceano Coronado-Delgadillo, also known as Jose Leonardo Olivo | |
| Represented By: | Marjorie A. Meyers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
