USA v. George Vasquez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| GEORGE VASQUEZ |
| 12-10253 |
| March 6, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
512339451
UNPUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [12-10253 Dismissed as Frivolous ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: JLD , Judge: CH Mandate pull date is 09/03/2013 for Appellant George Vasquez; denying motion to relieve attorney filed by Appellant Mr. George Vasquez [7316811-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. George Vasquez [7316811-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Derek D. Brown [7130139-2] [12-10253]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. George Vasquez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Thomas Burgess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: GEORGE VASQUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Derek D. Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
