Bobbi-Anne Toy v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOBBI-ANNE TOY
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Case Number: 12-20471
Filed: July 11, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs (Civil Rights)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 29, 2013 Summary Toy v. Holder, Jr.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 512223908 PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [12-20471 Affirmed] Judge: TMR , Judge: EGJ , Judge: JES. Mandate pull date is 06/20/2013 [12-20471]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bobbi-Anne Toy v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: BOBBI-ANNE TOY
Represented By: David Charles Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ERIC H HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Represented By: Julie Nayar Searle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?