Thomas Hayden, et al v. Crane Company
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS H. HAYDEN and JACQUELINE S. HAYDEN
Defendant - Appellant: CRANE COMPANY, Individually and as successor in interest to Chapman Valve Company, Jenkins Valve and Cochrane Corporation
Case Number: 16-30307
Filed: April 7, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Asbestos personal injury - P. L.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Hayden, et al v. Crane Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: THOMAS H. HAYDEN
Represented By: Charles W. Branham
Represented By: Mickey P. Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: JACQUELINE S. HAYDEN
Represented By: Charles W. Branham
Represented By: Mickey P. Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CRANE COMPANY, Individually and as successor in interest to Chapman Valve Company, Jenkins Valve and Cochrane Corporation
Represented By: Barry Clayton Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?